The question of legality of your own Rev Leave a comment

1857.

third.-The fresh last wedding off Court “Top and you will Point” A good.O.F. was prominent of the a meal in the Brother. Franklin’s, Hall Quay. Mr. C. B. Dashwood occupied the settee, and it also was stated that this new Court next contained 90 users.

Jan

Messrs. Charles J. Palmer, B. Fenn, Rev. H. Squire, Dumbleton, R. R. B. Norman, Burton, and you can J. Bayly is select the new people in people Library Committee.

p. 207 Your body regarding a great whale, that has been drawn at the Winterton, had been shown toward Chapel Plain.

The new Rev. W. D. Wade, the fresh minister out of St. Mary’s, Southtown, got, before Bla gjennom dette nettstedet leaving Southsea, already been served with a handbag of ?61.

twenty-first.-The fresh new “Sisters” is into the collision with one of the brick piers from the fresh new Connection, that it got a lot more damaged.

Feb. next.-An enthusiastic Anti-Tax fulfilling was stored from the Town Hallway. The newest Mayor presided, together with adopting the participated in what is happening:-Messrs. George Danby-Palmer, Bradbeer, Garson Blake, W. Livingston, S. B. Cory, R. Hammond, J. Clowes, J. H. Harrison, J. Rivett and you will J. Fiddes. Mr. S. Bradbeer appeared as if new mover within number.

Feb. 21st.-An effective “Poor’s Speed” appointment is kept during the Masonic Hallway. Mr. W. Livingston presided, and you may a resolution protesting up against the 1s. 6d. every quarter rate is followed. Messrs J. Rivett, Joseph Neave, Royal, Roentgen. Bailey, Nichols, and you may F. Starling spoke about them, because the carry out of the Guardians are defended by Mr. J. H. Harrison, among the Panel.

Feb. 25th.-An incident and that thrilled significant attract, was actually read from the Condition Court, Tolhouse-hallway, through to the Courtroom (T. J. Birch, Esq.) New plaintiff is Mr. John Cobb, leather-based vendor, for exactly who Mr. C. H. Chamberlin appeared; the newest defendants have been Messrs. W. N. Burroughs and you may G. D. Palmer, who have been depicted by the Mr. J. L. Cufaude. New plaintiff reported that he was an applicant into office out-of Councillor for the elizabeth such as for example on solicitation away from Messrs. W. Letter. Burroughs and G. D. Palmer. During the time he turned an applicant the guy decidedly advised them he won’t fork out of his own wallet way more than just ?ten with the expenses of the election, plus it was realized that Liberal cluster, that the guy belonged, create join the remainder. The night time until the election he obtained a quotation out of just what the expenses was likely to be, and in outcome of which he at once saw both Mr. Burroughs and Mr. G. D. Palmer. That imagine, the guy noticed, amounted to from the ?forty five, once the memberships entirely amounted so you’re able to but ?42. After particular conversation it agreed to hold him innocuous of the level of the expense which could exceed the sum of authorized, and then he and you can Mr. Burroughs following ran p. 208 towards the Committee-space of the Northern-ward, in which Mr. Burroughs said that they had made agreements because of their friend John Cobb winning the market-ward. The expense of election, which he (the latest plaintiff) destroyed, amounted entirely in order to ?58 1s. 7d. The balance, for this reason, which he now said regarding the defendants are ?sixteen 1s. 7d.-The plaintiff, during the mix-examination from the Mr. Cufaude, accepted that ?39 of the entire amount try to own – -.-Mr. Cufaude debated whenever, because the plaintiff said, the fresh defendants got given your a hope into excess expenses, the fresh new guarantee ought to come in creating. And you can, just in case the evidence is correct, which, yet not, the guy disputed, it absolutely was hopeless toward plaintiff to recuperate, inasmuch as he themselves had invited that a large part of the entire expenditures are for – -, which had been an unlawful act.-Mr. Chamberlin contended that the plaintiff, immediately after receiving new guarantee regarding defendants, acted simply on the fresh faith of these vow, and therefore for this reason, while they had registered upon a wedding to expend the money, these were responsible. The bucks, moreover, had not been spent by the plaintiff, however, of the committee appointed to conduct the fresh election, and you can up until the election try over, brand new plaintiff wasn’t aware that all money had already been invested into the – -.-His Honor told you it was obvious the fresh verify must have come written down. He had been regarding view, plus, that the plaintiff wasn’t destined to pay the illegal charges, and consequently he could not offer their action for the money that he advertised.-This new plaintiff was, correctly, non-suited.