This would in fact never be an issue with that it build; Sir John de Keith d Leave a comment

This would in fact never be an issue with that it build; Sir John de Keith d

Re: ? Comyn wife off Malise

Concerning the Comyn daughter who had been spouse out of Malise out-of Strathearn, I experienced theorized within the 2005 one she had been Margaret, recognized as spouse off Sir John de- Keith (discover duplicate regarding article less than) who was simply 2ndly elizabeth are supplied in this article: the fresh new partner Emma I would suggest are of another household members, and never mommy of your next Earl Malise.

Scots Peerage, sandwich _Comyn, Earl away from Buchan_ , states partly, ‘Malise, Earl regarding Strathearn, got a spouse Emma, from inside the 1261-1267, whose surname try not familiar ‘[SP II:256, alludes to Cal. from Docs., we. 2383, 2451]. a bit before 1270, so his widow (Margaret) could have been “available” a while immediately after Emma.

This is needless to say a conjecture; it can have the advantage of dealing with a known matchmaking between Muriel Keith and you may Reginald le Cheyne. Any longer related papers would of course getting allowed.

This new account inside Scots Peerage concerning the class of Keith claims from Sir John de Keith (d. ca. 1270) which he is actually said to features partnered Comyn, earl regarding Buchan . It character, of your own undecided (“said to was in fact”) diversity, may now end up being corrected according to the pursuing the dispensation, old during the Fondi on 14 The month of january 1378/9::

‘ Reg Aven 215, 50 Towards the bishop of Moray. Professors to dispense Reginald Cheyn, donzel, and you can Murielle, damselle, d de- Keth, of Moray and you will Aberdeen dioceses, on the impediment to help you matrimony arising from the third and fourth quantities of consanguinity. Fondi, 19 Kal. Feb., anno step 1. SRO Vat. Trans., iv, no. 46. ‘

Muriel Keith, the long term next partner regarding Robert Stewart, first Duke from Albany (d. 1420), are developed to help you marry Reginald le Cheyne, son out of Sir Reginald ce Cheyne because of the his spouse (once the her earliest partner), Helen off Strathearn. While you are discover recognized gaps on origins off Muriel Keith, she and you may Reginald ce Cheyne do share a descent about Comyns. But not, this might be as well distant to need https://lovingwomen.org/sv/panamanska-kvinnor/ an excellent dispensation if the Muriel was a good-great-high grandd Comyn, Earl of Buchan (d. 1233), which will become circumstances when the is why daughter.

dos. Reginald ce Cheyne try a beneficial-grandson away from Marjory Comyn, child out of Alexander Comyn, Earl away from Buchan (d. 1290), son out-of William Comyn listed above. Their unique son was Malise, Earl of Strathearn out-of 1312 to help you his demise within the 1328 , and you may parent from Reginald.

ca. 1270), are same as Marjory Comyn, and married 2ndly to Malise, Earl regarding Strathearn (d. 1312). This would mean the parentage a€?believed to has been’ compared to Margaret, partner out-of Sir John de Keith, is actually out-of that age group: she would not have been the fresh d Comyn, Earl from Buchan, but instead of his son Alexander. There is no facts you to definitely Earl Malise and you will Marjory Comyn have been partnered far prior to 1275: as Lindsay typed,

There clearly was one discernable base on what the partnership anywhere between Reginald ce Cheyne and you can Muriel Keith might have resided: in the event the Margaret Comyn, spouse from Sir John de Keith (d

‘ The brand new wife regarding the earl, on 1275, was entitled Marjory, as we comprehend the attesting term away from No. curriculum vitae., which is stated by Wyntoun, Publication VIII. chap. vi., having become the next sister regarding John Comyn, Earl away from Buchan, which negotiated on behalf of Earl Malise the wedding payment significantly more than stated [dated on London area, April 26, 1293 for their daughter Matilda and you may Robert de- Tony, child regarding Ralph].’

Alexander Comyn = E de- Quincy Age out of Buchan We __________________I________________ I III step one) Sir John = Marjory = 2) Malise de- Keith We (als We Elizabeth off Strathearn . 1270 I Margaret) We d. 1312 _____________I__ ___I__________________________ I I We We We We Sir William Bernard Malise Gilbert Robert Maud de- Keith de Keith Age out-of = Robert d. bef 1293 Strathearn; d. 1328 de- Tony We ______I_______________________ I I I I Sir Edward Malise Mary Helen = Isabella de- Age off Strathearn = 1) Sir Reginald Synton d. california. 1343 We ce Cheyne We We I = 2) Sir David We V We I de- Graham Sir William de We I__________ Keith I We = Margaret Fraser __________________I_______ V __I_____________ We I We III I I I I Muriel + Reginald Mary Mariota Keith le Cheyne (= Robert Stewart, Duke away from Albany)

Trả lời

Email của bạn sẽ không được hiển thị công khai.